Leadership & Organisational Culture
Why Most Change Initiatives Fail
Culture is the shared identity of an organization.
It’s what gets rewarded, tolerated, ignored, or punished, especially under pressure.
Culture answers unspoken questions like:
These answers are rarely explicit. They’re learned through observation.
Most organisations don’t fail because of strategy. They fail because of culture.
And culture doesn’t live in values decks, mission statements, or off-sites. It lives in behaviour, especially the behaviour people don’t talk about.
Example:
A tech company posts values about “bold thinking” and “challenging assumptions.” In practice:
The stated culture says one thing. The enacted culture rewards another.
This gap is because of organisational scripting. The people enacting the contradictory patterns genuinely believe they’re aligned. They can’t see the scripts they’re performing.
Culture is not designed. It’s absorbed.
(Whether You Intend It or Not)
Leaders are always modelling, especially when they think they’re not.
How you handle dissent teaches people whether honesty is welcome.
How you respond to failure teaches people whether risk is safe.
How you manage pressure teaches people what matters when things get hard.
“People don’t do what leaders say. They do what leaders get away with.”
If a leader says “speak up” but punishes disagreement through silence, withdrawal, or passive retaliation, people learn the actual rule: compliance, not candor.
Over time, teams internalise unwritten norms:
These rules shape behaviour more powerfully than any stated value.
They’re not written in policy.
They’re encoded in who gets promoted, whose ideas get implemented, and who gets quietly managed out.
Unregulated leaders create regulated teams – through silence, compliance, or burnout.
Power doesn’t disappear by pretending it’s not there.
It operates invisibly, shaping who speaks, who’s heard, and whose reality counts.
Your best people aren’t leaving because of money.
They’re leaving because their competence isn’t legible to your systems.
A mid-level manager who is methodical, low-volume, terrifyingly reliable, rewires a legacy process so the company stops losing a day of work every other week. No one at the monthly meeting reads that line on the slide.
The director notices the loud presenter with the flashier deck and hires two junior analysts to “scale the idea.”
Six months later, the quiet manager resigns. Nobody knows why the best systems thinker left. They only know the churn number went up.
This is the quiet leak. It’s invisible until it’s costly.
If your recognition systems reward performative visibility over actual value creation, you’ll systematically lose your most valuable people.
Most organisations filter for legible signals:
Gallup estimates replacing a leader costs tens to hundreds of thousands.
But the real cost is strategic.
You lose institutional knowledge, pattern recognition, and trust networks you didn’t know you had.
Performed authenticity maintains the existing power structure while looking inclusive.
Actual authenticity disrupts power by redistributing who gets heard and whose competence counts.
Organisations don’t just have cultures. They have scripts.
Just like individuals perform inherited scripts from family systems, organisations perform scripts inherited from:
Example:
A consulting firm claims to value work-life balance. But:
The script isn’t written anywhere. But it’s understood that availability = commitment = advancement.
Anyone who tries to set boundaries gets culturally selected out.
“Move fast and break things”
Translation: Urgency over sustainability. Burnout as loyalty. Speed mistaken for progress.
“Culture fit”
Translation: Conform to dominant patterns. Difference as threat. Homogeneity as safety.
“Meritocracy”
Translation: Success = worthiness. Structural barriers invisible. Performance as morality.
“We’re a family”
Translation: Boundaries are betrayal. Unlimited availability expected. Leaving is abandonment.
“Data-driven decisions”
Translation: Only quantifiable value counts. Relationship work, cultural stewardship, and long-horizon thinking get deprioritised.
Scripts don’t need explicit policy. They’re maintained through:
Leaders can’t see the patterns they’re swimming in. Especially when those patterns created their success.
Innovation stagnation – If only certain types of thinking are legible, you lose the pattern disruptors who see what you can’t.
Talent churn – People don’t leave bad jobs. They leave jobs that can’t recognize their value.
Reputation damage – One viral Glassdoor review or LinkedIn post exposes the gap between stated and enacted values.
Strategic blindspots – Homogeneous thinking creates predictable failure modes. You can’t see the risks your culture trains you to ignore.
Legal and ethical risk – When scripts maintain bias (about gender, race, class, neurodivergence), the organisation becomes legally vulnerable.
You can’t diversify an organisation without changing the scripts that define success.
If “leadership presence” means white, male, neurotypical extroversion patterns, you’ll hire diverse candidates and then select them out through performance reviews that penalize difference.
Real inclusion requires making success legible across different ways of:
This isn’t “lowering standards.” It’s expanding what counts as competence.
Most culture change follows the same playbook:
You can’t change culture by adding new content (values, training modules, posters). Culture is systemic. It’s reinforced through hiring, promotion, resource allocation, meeting dynamics, and who gets heard.
If you train people on psychological safety but promote the loudest voices, the system wins.
Telling people to “be more collaborative” or “embrace failure” doesn’t work if the underlying scripts say:
Scripts operate unconsciously. Behavioural interventions alone can’t reach them.
Leaders often can’t see the scripts they’re reinforcing because they benefit from those scripts. If you rose through the system by performing a certain way, you’ll unconsciously select for people who perform similarly.
This is why diversity initiatives fail. You can’t hire differently if your assessment of “culture fit” is actually “performs the dominant script.”
Most initiatives focus on “raising awareness” without building mechanisms for pattern interruption. Awareness helps. But it’s not enough. You need people who can name the pattern when it’s happening and have the authority to interrupt it.
You can’t mandate trust. You have to earn it.
Can organisational culture really change?
Yes, but not through content alone. Culture changes when the systems that enforce scripts change.
This requires leadership willing to disrupt patterns they benefit from.
How long does culture transformation take?
Minimum 12-18 months for meaningful shifts.
Faster attempts usually create performance without integration—people learn to say new things while acting old patterns.
What if leadership doesn’t see the problem?
Then the problem won’t get solved. Cultural blindness at the top prevents pattern recognition below.
External facilitation helps when internal sight is limited.
Do we need to change everything at once?
No. Identify the highest-cost scripts first.
What’s driving turnover? What’s blocking innovation? Start there. Momentum builds.
How do we measure culture change?
Not with engagement surveys alone.
Track: turnover patterns (who’s leaving and why), promotion patterns (who gets advanced), meeting dynamics (who speaks and whose ideas stick), resource allocation (what work gets funded), feedback patterns (what gets dismissed vs. integrated).
What if the scripts come from the founder?
This is common and difficult. Founders often can’t see their patterns as scripts—they see them as “how we do things.”
External intervention helps. Or succession planning that explicitly names what will change.
Is UNSCRIPT™ just diversity training?
No. Diversity training adds content (“be inclusive”).
UNSCRIPT™ dismantles systems that penalise difference. The work overlaps, but the mechanism is different.
What happens to people who can’t adapt?
Some won’t. People whose success depends on the old scripts will experience culture change as loss.
The question is whether you’re optimising for their comfort or organisational health.
You need pattern disruption at the system level.

Own your story – stop apologising for your life